Monday, 8 August 2011

My Karachi’s Saga




By Fatima Bhutto


Karachi, The city of lights, as it is known, has long been the facade Pakistan wished to show to the world. The port city, one of the largest cities in the world, placed sixth or seventh, depending on whom you ask, with a population of more than 18 million, once represented the ideal of what Pakistan ought to have been.

This city was and still is the nation’s most ethnically diverse, carrying a reputation for being generously accepting and accommodating, a city that opened its doors to refugees, to migrants, to traders, artists and business communities who sought a harbor from which to connect to the outside shores.

With communities as varied as Zoroastrians whose philanthropy built much of the city, Jews at one time, Baha’is and Hindus amongst many others, Karachi is undoubtedly the most religiously tolerant of its fellow cities. But this is no longer the face of Karachi that the world can see.

It is a city now plagued by internecine violence, targeted killings and lawlessness. Karachi has become the battleground, as it always has been, for the country’s inept and corrupt political elements. Even though 70 percent of the total annual tax revenue collected by Pakistan’s government comes from Karachi, the country’s stock exchange is here, and it is the commercial pulse of Pakistan, the government has been content to let the carnage in Karachi fester.

While Karachi, like all big cities, has always had its fair share of crime, the violence here mutates and constantly changes form. At times it is gang-related, as it is now, the bloodshed mercilessly fought out between powerful criminal mobs with high-level political patronage from the ruling parties. At other times it has been more outward looking, and embassies and foreign fast-food franchises have been the target of ire against the War on Terror, a war most Pakistanis see as unjust and illegal.

And then there have been brutal suppressions of democratic protests here, movements against martial law, various dictators and politically oppressive dictates have been cruelly put down by state forces in the city.

But we are not a city that operates under religious extremism. Karachi’s violence has nothing to do with Islam, with Islamic fundamentalism or the ugly manifestations of religious violence. In fact, it is a city that in recent years has largely managed to hold itself away from this growing trend. The Danish cartoon riots in the city were less enthusiastic than in other parts of the country. The recent violence against the blasphemy laws was almost totally confined to the Punjab province, and religious parties in Karachi have traditionally been viewed with a mixture of antipathy and disinterest.

The ruling Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) have been fighting their coalition partners the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), a party based largely in Karachi, almost since the start of their tenure in power.

Just this month, the PPP’s senior provincial minister Zulfiqar Mirza fuelled deadly protests in Karachi after he attacked the MQM, referring to it as being a party of “criminals, target killers and extortionists.” The name-calling prompted the MQM to label the comments as hate speech, and Mirza apologised. A week later it was the MQM that accused Mirza of running ‘killing brigades,’ staging a walkout from the National Assembly with the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz in protest. The prime minister has ordered an investigation, one of the many he has ordered this year in the face of growing outrage over his government’s mishandling of the law-and-order situation in Karachi.

Two weeks ago Karachi saw a death toll of some 100 people killed in just about five days, casualties in a turf war waged between activists from political parties. Perhaps one shouldn’t be surprised. In the mid-1990s, when the PPP and the MQM last formed a coalition government the two also fought a war on Karachi’s streets, some 3,000 people were killed during what’s known as ‘Operation Clean Up.’

Meanwhile, Pukhtoon-based Awami National Party is being attacked for control over the city’s transport routes, an economic turf war that has been increasingly bloody. When the violence becomes inflamed, as has happened this July, the MQM threatens to walk out of the government, sometimes does, and then duly returns a few days later. And so the cycle continues, although leaders of the three parties met this week and agreed to work toward peace in the city.

The violence, which reared its head in 2008, has seen bodies dumped on roadsides in gunny bags, riots that paralyse the city, journalists killed, and hundreds upon hundreds of innocents killed and maimed. Political activists saw a high death toll last year, as many as 237 were killed as were 300 other civilians in the city, according to the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP). The HRCP has calculated that 1,100 people have been murdered in the first half of this year, a murder rate that matches that of Cuidad Juarez, Mexico’s infamously dangerous city caught in a brutal drug war. Juarez, however, has seen its homicides and violent crimes decline in recent months, while Karachi’s is escalating.

The Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies claims that overall violence in Karachi last year rose by 288 percent from the previous year, thanks to sectarian and political violence, crime and lawlessness. The government has responded to the violence by issuing orders for Karachi’s paramilitary Rangers forces to shoot on sight armed men. But that is it for political solutions to city’s bloodshed, more bloodshed.

But Karachiites still hold on to a view of their city that is untarnished by this violence. Businesses open their shutters every day and run their trade without electricity, cut for hours in the hot summer months and hours more in the winter. Couples still stand on Native Jetty Bridge, built at the time of the Raj to connect the port to the rest of the city and make wishes into the salty sea.

There are many problems this city must face because the violence does not define the city. It is imposed upon it, but it is not out of it. Drive around the streets from Saddar to Korangi, and you’ll see amongst the ubiquitous political sloganeering painted Urdu paeans to Karachi. This is a survivor’s city.

Fatima Bhutto is a Pakistani poet and writer. She is granddaughter of Pakistan's former Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto.

http://www.thecapitalpost.com

Tuesday, 26 July 2011

A concert for peace and intercultural harmony


A concert for peace and intercultural harmony

By Mansoor Razaque

WASHINGTON: As a historical fact, the language of music in Indo-Pak speaks directly to the hearts and minds of the people. Whenever and wherever artist from Subcontinent perform – their show of solidarity nudges opportunities for more peace, tranquility and intercultural harmony. It creates an enabling environment where new ideas germinate and bold initiatives sprout.

The concert recently organized by Manish Sood of “Across The World Travels” at DAR Constitution Hall in Washington DC brings a testimony to this claim. The Intense live concert featured music icons like Atif Aslam and Sunidhi Chauhan. The Capital Post, which was one of the lead media partners, had extensive across the line promotional activities for this concert.

Atif Aslam and Sunidhi Chauhan’s mesmerizing performance was greatly lauded by the participants. Both Sunidhi and Atif sung a good number of singles and dance hits from their new albums and also captivated the cheering and waving crowd with their energy and joie de vivre. Atif also sung a couple of songs from his recent movie “BOL” which is aimed at creating more awareness toward social plight of women in the developing world. A large number of Americans, members of the South Asian Community and media persons attended the program.

Earlier on the eve of press briefing, The Capital Post’s Chief Editor Mr Mansoor Razaque presented Atif Aslam, Sunidhi Chauhan and Mr Manish Sood (event organizer) with The Capital Post Certificates of Appreciation. These souvenirs marked the humble acknowledgment of the services of these people in their respective fields of human endeavor.

On this occasion, Mr Mansoor Razaque also announced that as part of its editorial mission, The Capital Post will continue extending support to such initiatives in future that foster interfaith harmony and global peace and development.



http://www.thecapitalpost.com

Monday, 18 July 2011

Barker, Bulova inaugurate political campaign office


By Mansoor Razaque 

FAIRFAX COUNTY, VA: As the United States gets closer to Election 2012; State Senator George Barker (D-39) officially opened his campaign office here on Sunday. 

The headquarters is a joint office located in downtown Springfield shared with Fairfax County Chairman Sharon Bulova (D-At large) Fairfax County Supervisor Jeff McKay (D-Lee) and Delegate Mark Sickles (D-43). 

Special guests who graced the event included Congressman Jim Moran (VA-08), Congressman Gerry Connolly (VA-11), and Virginia Democratic Party Chairman Brian Moran. 

Welcoming guests and volunteers on this occasion, Fairfax County chairman Sharon Bulova said it was a moment of great pride and joy to share Senator Barker’s political office along with Lee District Supervisor Jeff McKay and Delegate Mark Sickles. Bulova thanked all the participants and volunteers for their presence and urged all County residents to come forward and support President Obama for his re-election bid. 

Talking to The Capital Post Chief Editor Mansoor Razaque Congressman Jim Moran lauded the efforts of President Barack Obama for pioneering people-friendly policies. Moran expressed confidence that a damaging debt default would be averted and President Obama would be re-elected with thumping majority in 2012. 

Senator Barker also spoke to this scribe on President Obama’s re-election drive and his core reforms agenda. Barker said he was running on a platform of education reforms, advancing environmental interests, and hoping to reintroduce his bill to extend polling hours, which failed in a House of Delegates Committee. Barker praised Sharon Bulova for her proactive role in the development of Fairfax County. 

The event concluded with a rally and then volunteers made some phone calls to mobilize support for upcoming election. They also went into the neighborhood to knock on doors for the campaign.

http://www.thecapitalpost.com

Monday, 27 June 2011

Lobbying for Pakistan on Capitol Hill



By Mansoor Razaque

WASHINGTON: While Pakistani American Community is actively promoting Pakistan’s core interests in Washington D.C, it is sad to note that no Pakistani organization has any credible lobbying at the Capitol Hill; Democrat Congressman from New Jersey Rush D. Holt expressed these views while addressing the annual meeting of Pakistan American Congress (PAC). Mr Rush stated he was supportive of Pakistan’s role in war against terror, but the Osama Bin Laden episode caused strain in Pak-US bilateral relations and now the debate is underway in the Congress to condition US aid to the terror-ravaged county. He expressed hope that despite diplomatic coldness – both countries will manage to resolve misunderstandings since these relations are based on strategic interdependency. “Pakistani Community can play an active role in United States-Pakistan relations”, Mr Rush added.

Republican Congressman from Ohio, Steve Chabot while talking to The Capital Post Chief Editor, Mr Mansoor Razaque, said both countries are jointly fighting war against terrorism. He said countering the Do More demand affects the bilateral relations but realities should guide the decision-making process. Leading Congressional Democrat, Rep. Allyson Schwartz in her address underscored Pak-US relations; she said the US remains committed to helping Pakistan in rooting our terror and is fully appreciative of its sacrifices.

Dr Zulfiqar Kazmi also addressed on the occasion. Pakistan Embassy official Shujaat Rathore dispelled the widespread impression that Pakistan received 20 billion dollars in aid from the United States. He said Pakistan has sacrificed over 40,000 precious lives and incurred financial losses worth 70 billion dollars in the last one decade. “Despite these huge sacrifices, US media is always spreading anti-Pakistan propaganda. Things don’t seem to get better and anti-Americanism is on the rise”, Rathore expressed.

Three Congressmen attended Pakistan American Congress meeting. Congressman Steve Chabot’s speech was attended by only 20 participants while many journalists left the room during conference proceedings protesting over mismanagement.

PAC President Dr Khalid Luqman told The Capital Post that past mistakes and acts of mismanagement would not be tolerated during his tenure. He said robust and proactive approach would now be implemented at all levels to garner support for Pakistan at the Capitol Hill. “We will make our educated youth part of PAC’s future endeavors”, Luqman added.

Speaking on the occasion, PAC Vice President Mohsin Bashir hailed the revival of Pakistan American Congress. He expressed hopes that under new management, a new era of research and development at PAC would usher in which will further deepen United States-Pakistan relations.

If seen in a broader context of public diplomacy, Pakistani American Community seems united to project a soft image of their motherland in their individual capacities; however, their so-called representative organizations continue to be disarray. The executive bodies of these organizations mainly comprise of either less-educated or inexperienced spin-doctors who want to promote their own interests by hosting symbolic get-togethers and photo-shots.

Quite interestingly, friends of Pakistan Caucus in the US House of Representatives (both Democrats and Republicans) seem to question as to why these whole host of organizations don’t get united to project their country’s strategic core interests. On the contrary, Indian Community Organizations bear testimony to this fact.

Onus is on now on Pakistani think tanks and organizations to shun their divisions and get together to meaningfully lobbying the cause of Pakistan as true front-line ambassadors. The sooner they realize it, the better.

The writer is Chief Editor of The Capital Post

www.thecapitalpost.com

Saturday, 25 June 2011

TCP EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW

The Capital Post Exclusive Interview

Zubair Ahmed Khan
Minister for Rural Development
Sindh

Interview Panel:

Dr Masood R. Qureshi
Ms Adeela Siddiqui
Mr Syed Fareed Hussain
Dr Sadia Irfan

The Capital Post recently had an exclusive interview with Sindh Minister for Rural Development, Mr Zubair Ahmed Khan. During the interview, TCP editorial team discussed with the provincial minister the constraints, issues and new opportunities to bring about a much-needed socio-economic change for the people of rural Sindh.

Political economists opine that this growing rural-urban divide is a serious concern not only for the welfare of the rural population, but also because it is potentially destabilizing. Thus revitalizing the rural economy, accelerating rural growth, and improving the income level of the rural poor is urgently needed.

TCP: Thank you very much – please tell us a bit about your academic background and political career?

ZAK: I thank The Capital Post and its editorial team for giving me this opportunity to present my views to my fellow Pakistani Americans. I was born in Hyderabad (Sindh) in 1970. From my student days, the philosophy and vision of Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) founder Mr Altaf Hussain has been a great source of inspiration for me. For the first time in Pakistan’s history, Mr Altaf Hussain raised a political party taking the middle class on board. He thus created a sense of political participation for all and provided emancipation from bonds of feudal culture. I joined the All Pakistan Muttahida Students Organization (APMSO) and then never looked back. I obtained a masters degree in Economics and then completed my MBA in management sciences from Sindh University.

TCP: Historically and factually speaking, the conditions of rural areas of Sindh still remind us of the Dark Ages? Why is it so?

ZAK: Well - you are right. The rural Sindh embodies about 50% of the province’s population. While urban Sindh’s social indicators equal or surpass the level of development in other developing countries with comparable per capita income, the level of human development in rural Sindh is worse than in some of the Sub-Saharan African states.

In rural areas, nine out of every ten newborns are delivered without proper medical supervision, three out of four girls are not enrolled in school, two out of three adults cannot read or write, and two out of every five of its citizens survive below the poverty line. This increasing social gap in Sindh is the highest among all the provinces. The space widens as one moves to higher education and finally to participation in the job market. The rural-urban duality is widespread in both the economic and social sectors.

Despite all these demerits and feelings of deprivation, we are actively trying to alleviate the sufferings of the people and Sindh government has sanctioned various projects in this regard.

TCP: What were the factors that led to the establishment of Rural Development Department?

ZAK: Sindh is the backbone of Pakistan’s economy. No public sector development programs were undertaken in the province by any government until 1972 when Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto conceived and established this department. The rural development department lost its identity when the other military regimes merged it into the Local Bodies System (LBS). There used to be about 700 employees before its merger with the LBS.

After 2008 general elections, when Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) joined the coalition government in Sindh – we were assigned this department.

TCP: Was it by chance that this department was given to MQM?

ZAK: No – it was not by choice. To date three of MQM’s provincial ministers have no portfolios; therefore it was not at all by choice. When I took oath as provincial minister, the philosophy and vision of Mr Altaf Hussain proved to be a guideline for us to embark on new development projects in rural areas. One of our slogans in 2008 election campaign was “Ikhtiyar Sab Ke Liye” (Empowerment for All), and on the same pattern we re-organized this department to resolve the issues of rural Sindh. This department was officially notified on October 6, 2009 by Sindh Chief Minister. After notification – we undertook a number of rural development schemes keeping in view budgetary constraints.

TCP: What is your departmental criterion for undertaking public welfare schemes?

ZAK: Our ministry can take up development projects only in rural areas meeting certain requirements. For example, we would prefer a populace of minimum of 500 people. When we visit far-flung areas in interior Sindh, it is commonly observed that even villages comprising of 100 or even less habitants do exist. According to official statistics, there are approximately 94000 such villages in Sindh. We have built road networks, provided potable water and basic healthcare to villagers.

TCP: In this 21st century, it is awful to see vast majority of these people are still drinking “Green Water” (water contaminated with Algae)?

ZAK: Yes, this is highly unfortunate. The past governments have done nothing to avert this situation and we had to inherit all these problems. However, ours is a visionary leadership and has a manifesto that promises basic amenities like healthcare, education, shelter and food for all. In 23 districts of Sindh, our department has constructed roads, provided hand pumps especially in Thatta, Badin, Shikarpur and Kashmore districts to alleviate the sufferings of these people.

Considering our performance and viability of projects, Sindh government approved the grant of Rs 316 million for our new projects. However due to worst flooding in 2010 which caused massive destruction of across Pakistan – 30 percent of our budgetary allocation was diverted to Prime Minister’s flood relief fund.

TCP: What is your viewpoint on reports that massive aid was misappropriated in Hand Pump schemes, and like in the past this corruption episode was also hushed up?

ZAK: We had very limited resource allocation for this Hand Pump project. I personally visit all districts to inspect our various ongoing projects since we don’t want any corruption. A few days ago, I visited Ghotki, Sukkur and Thatta districts to look overthe construction of a road at Chal Gari area. The purpose of my visits is to keep a check on the pace of all these projects and make sure that these public welfare schemes are not engulfed by corruption.

The World Bank gave us financial assistance for a number of infra-structure projects. Many such projects could not reach the fruition just due to the lapse of specified time. Under the existing rules and regulations, we cannot directly approach the World Bank or any other donor agency.

TCP: How do you liaise with donor agencies to get funding for your projects?

ZAK: The federal government can liaise with these aid agencies. The ministry of finance notifiesthe chief secretary who then informs us about the availability of funds and resource allocations.

TCP: If seen in a broader context – what are Sindh’s overarching constraints?

ZAK: The constraints facing Sindh are numerous. Some of the province-wide constraints that affect both urban and rural districts, and impede investment and development include regulatory policy uncertainty, law and order, corruption, and a culture of nonpayment for or even outright theft of government provided services, like through utility hook-ups. Attention to these issues is important if rural development is to be successful and enduring. However, strategic framework will not address such overarching constraints. Nonetheless, it is essential that the provincial government address these concerns to buttress direct rural development programs and initiatives.

TCP: Major stumbling block to improving human development in the province is weak governance?

ZAK: The cause of poor service delivery in Sindh is not the under-provisioning of key inputs (teachers, doctors, schools, hospitals, budget outlay), but their low productivity. For example, Sindh has adequate number of teachers, but many of them are either not competent (issue of capacity) or they do not show up for work because there is no effective monitoring system (issue of corruption). The rural residents have little choice in schooling, as government policies do not encourage private schools (issue of competition), and, at the same time, the provincial and local governments work at cross-purposes to undermine each other’s effectiveness (issue of coordination). The “governance deficit” has translated into a “service delivery deficit” in the province. One of the most compelling pieces of evidence supporting the argument above comes from policymakers themselves, who in their response to a survey indicated that the biggest stumbling block to improving human development in the province is weak governance.

TCP: How would you gear up efforts to develop basic infrastructure in rural areas?

ZAK: I think that critical constraint inhibiting rural development is the lack of infrastructure to support agro-enterprises and farmers. The per capita amount of roads, electricity, and domestic water supply is very low, and inhibits economic growth. Farm to market roads, roads linking markets to district centers, and to the national road grid are required. Electricity supply in the hinterland is non-existent or unreliable, making investments in small and medium enterprises unprofitable. Clean water supplies for human consumption are also extremely limited, and contribute to added health problems in rural areas. Investments in all three areas are required to support interventions in directly productive enterprises on the farm, and in enterprises that create rural employment off the farm.

TCP: How much investment does the government plan to make for short, mid and long term projects?

ZAK: In the past, the people who managed rural uplift projects were either not serious at all or fell prey to administrative or political corruption.

The progress on current schemes at the beginning of the fiscal year FY2009-10 as well as new projects included in the PSDP FY2011-12, make up the Rural Investment Plan. These new schemes of FY2012 reflect the priorities of our department and the focus on rural growth and revitalization. Pl note that huge allocations of PRs6 billion and PRs10 billion have been kept for FY2011 and FY2012 and these may be allocated against new schemes (to be formulated from PRs30 billion).
To sum up – It gives me immense pleasure to put it on record that despite financial constraints, we have wisely channeled our budget and launched well-planned schemes. We are involving all stakeholders so that there is no chance of corruption or nepotism as you rightly mentioned had been happening in the past. I would like to be remembered as a minister who delivered for his people. Unfortunately, people are drinking unhygienic water even after 63 years in these areas. It is alarming to note that cases of Hepatitis and Tuberculosis are also on the rise.

TCP: How do you forecast new political scenario in Pakistan? Challenges are cropping up from all sides?

ZAK: The Muttahida Qaumi Movement proposed to convene an all party’s conference to address national issues. Our greatest threat emanates from within and not without. Onus is on all political forces of Pakistan to show exemplary political maturity and tolerance to sort out differences so that Pakistan can see political and economic stability. The MQM and PPP coalition government in Sindh is a good example for others to follow. The people are getting disappointed from this political dispensation since they notice their problems are increasing with every passing day and there is no ray of hope at the end of the tunnel.

MQM also took up the issue of Karachi Electric Supply Company (KESC) very forcefully. We are against burgeoning unemployment in the country. We don’t want injustice – however, the federal government should take bold steps to quell this ongoing power crisis. Once it becomes serious, all these problems will resolve amicably to the satisfaction of all.

TCP: What do you have to say about the future of Pak-US relations?

ZAK: It lies in our own wider political and economic interests to have equitable relations with United States. Pakistan and United States understand each other’s strategic compulsions and both remain determined to resolving all bilateral issues under the umbrella of civil-military dialogue process. Being a superpower, the US should understand Pakistan’s problems and create an atmosphere which is conducive to peace and development.

TCP: Do you wish to give any message to Pakistani Americans especially business community?

ZAK: Well, Pakistani American community can play a very important role in the rural development of Sindh. We can jointly offer human development programs, vocational training schemes, basic computer training courses etc. We would welcome investments from private sector in our projects. Your organization, Sindh Vision in collaboration with our department can impart technical training in diverse fields such as information technology, resource development etc. I believe growth prospects for our rural areas will get impetus as we see increase in foreign investment and technical assistance. Here I would thank The Capital Post for highlighting the merits and demerits of our rural areas – since we believe in working together and would welcome initiatives in this regard.

TCP: Minister thank you very much for your time

www.thecapitalpost.com